WELCOME! If this is your first visit to Your Lincoln Park.com Community Website & Forums, we invite you to become a registered forum member and share your ideas and comments in over 100 forum categories created to help make Our City of Lincoln Park one of the best downriver communities. Registration is FREE but required to post in many of the forums. Be sure to review our Privacy Policy and Forum Rules (TOS) prior to posting. Posts will be moderated for all members with 10 posts or less. |
|
#1
|
|||||
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts/Thanks: 2,338/8 Thanked 281 Times in 189 Posts
|
|||||
Army faces worst recruiting slump in years
WASHINGTON - The Army is closing the books on one of the leanest recruiting years since it became an all-volunteer service three decades ago, missing its enlistment target by the largest margin since 1979 and raising questions about its plans for growth Many in Congress believe the Army needs to get bigger — perhaps by 50,000 soldiers over its current 1 million — in order to meet its many overseas commitments, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Army already is on a path to add 30,000 soldiers, but even that will be hard to achieve if recruiters cannot persuade more to join the service. Officials insist the slump is not a crisis. Michael O'Hanlon, a defense analyst at the Brookings Institution think tank, said the recruiting shortfall this year does not matter greatly — for now. "The bad news is that any shortfall shows how hard it would be to increase the Army's size by 50,000 or more as many of us think appropriate," O'Hanlon said. "We appear to have waited too long to try." The Army has not published official figures yet, but it apparently finished the 12-month counting period that ends Friday with about 73,000 recruits. Its goal was 80,000. A gap of 7,000 enlistees would be the largest — in absolute number as well as in percentage terms — since 1979, according to Army records. The Army National Guard and the Army Reserve, which are smaller than the regular Army, had even worse results. The active-duty Army had not missed its target since 1999, when it was 6,290 recruits short; in 1998 it fell short by 801, and in 1995 it was off by 33. Prior to that the last shortfall was in 1979 when the Army missed by 17,054 during a period when the Army was much bigger and its recruiting goals were double today's. Army officials knew at the outset that 2005 would be a tough year to snag new recruits. By May it was obvious that after four consecutive months of coming up short there was little chance of meeting the full-year goal. A summertime surge of signups offered some hope the slump may be ending. An Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Bryan Hilferty, said that despite the difficulties, recruiters were going full speed as the end of fiscal year 2005, Sept. 30, arrived. "We have met the active Army's monthly recruiting goals since June, and we expect to meet it for September, which sends us into fiscal year 2006 on a winning streak," Hilferty said. He also noted that the Army has managed to meet its re-enlistment goals, even among units that have been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. But there are compelling reasons to think that Army recruiters are heading into a second consecutive year of recruiting shortfalls. The outlook is dimmed by several key factors, including: • The daily reports of American deaths in Iraq and the uncertain nature of the struggle against the insurgency have put a damper on young people's enthusiasm for joining the military, according to opinion surveys. • The Army has a smaller-then-usual reservoir of enlistees as it begins the new recruiting year on Saturday. This pool comes from what the Army calls its delayed-entry program in which recruits commit to join the Army on condition that they ship to boot camp some months later. Normally that pool is large enough at the start of the recruiting year to fill one-quarter of the Army's full-year need. But it has dwindled so low that the Army is starting its new recruiting year with perhaps only 5 percent "in the bank." The official figure on delayed entry recruits has not been released publicly, although Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, has said it is the smallest in history. The factors working against the Army, Hilferty said, are a strong national economy that offers young people other choices, and "continued negative news from the Middle East." To offset that the Army has vastly increased the number of recruiters on the street, offered bigger signup bonuses and boosted advertising. Charles Moskos, a military sociologist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill., said in an interview that the Army would attract more recruits if it could offer shorter enlistments than the current three-year norm. As it stands, the Army faces a tough challenge for the foreseeable future. "The future looks even grimmer. Recruiting is going to get harder and harder," Moskos said.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ recordar la yocorazon |
#2
|
|||||
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts/Thanks: 1,073/1 Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
|
|||||
Re: Army faces worst recruiting slump in years
What is your signature supposed to say? I believe it is wrong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Where is fancy bred? In the heart or in the head? ---Willy Wonka. |
#3
|
|||||
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts/Thanks: 2,338/8 Thanked 281 Times in 189 Posts
|
|||||
Re: Army faces worst recruiting slump in years
It is correct. |
#4
|
|||||
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts/Thanks: 7,777/211 Thanked 224 Times in 164 Posts
|
|||||
Re: Army faces worst recruiting slump in years
It must be......they sent my 18 year old a reminder to sign up card.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Sometimes we must serve in order to lead" by Unknown |
#5
|
|||||
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts/Thanks: 714/0 Thanked 27 Times in 26 Posts
|
|||||
Re: Army faces worst recruiting slump in years
duh, i wonder why no one is joining the military. bring back the draft, then you will see protesting like we had in the 60s! |
#6
|
|||||
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts/Thanks: 2,338/8 Thanked 281 Times in 189 Posts
|
|||||
Re: Army faces worst recruiting slump in years
When the military is fighting a war, young men see the "glory of combat" and can't wait to sign up. The present "keeping of the peace" takes away the ability of a soldier to control his own destiny. Rather than fighting the enemy, a soldier is asked to stand around and not get blown up. If I had to choose between doing a cambat tour of Vietnam and "keeping the peace" in Iraq. I would choose Vietnam hands down. We had a hard time figuring out who the enemy, but sooner or later we could get the hang of it. The enemy could literally be anyone in Iraq. In Vietnam if would see someone on the street and wonder if he will be hiding and shooting at you later in the day. In Iraq, the guy walking down the street just may be a human bomb. At least Charlie wanted to live as much as we did. They wanted to kill us while risking their own life, but they were not about to commit suicide. |
|
|
Advertise & Volunteers Business Yellow Pages In Honor of - Joseph "Smokey Joe" Lyson |
|
| Your City of Lincoln Park Community Website | Privacy Statement Review MMSi Copyright, Privacy, Disclaimers and Terms of Use Policies here. |